Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer Essay

Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer - Essay ExampleIn order to prove the hollowness of this speciesism, Singer provides the example of the history of slavery. The White slave owners never took the sufferings of the Black slaves into consideration because their moral concerns were limited to White people (135). Thus, according to him, if racism is not moral, speciesism too is immoral. Secondly, Singer opines that animals gull interests because they have feelings like pain (135). Also, Singer points out animals have equal rights despite their lack of communication skills and intelligence because lunatics and infants too enjoy equal rights. The learner says that equality in quality is not a necessary factor for giving moral value to non humanity things. He claims that even within the human species, there is wide disparity in qualities like intelligence, physical strength, ability to communicate, and so on.However, the problem with Singers credit is that in his effort to nurs e animal rights, he forgot the fact that humans too atomic number 18 animals with the right to protect their own interests like all other animals do. It is for Singer to show a cow or a goat that tries to preserve some grass for another species before filling its own stomach. The mistake with Singers opinion is that he failed to acknowledge the fact that all advanced species take maximum advantage of the circumstances to promote their own welfare. Singer admits the fact that there are pests in nature. Then he has to admit that humans are just another group of pests that takes advantage of the suitable circumstances to grow. This is the law of nature.Another photograph of his opinion is that he has mixed morality with nature. The mere fact is that morality is just a social construct which is purely aimed at human welfare. Moreover, the plan of morality, as he admits, is not concrete. It varies from time to time, and population to population. According to the